Neal Gabler’s NYTimes piece about John McCain’s success with the media is entertaining. Here’s snippet:
Seeming to view himself and the whole political process with a mix of
amusement and bemusement, Mr. McCain is an ironist wooing a group of
individuals who regard ironic detachment more highly than sincerity or
seriousness. He may be the first real postmodernist candidate for the
presidency — the first to turn his press relations into the basis of
He’s right about McCain’s easy treatment in the media. Just look at how often reporters attach McCain’s own branded adjectives to him–"maverick" or "straight-talker." See Gabler’s piece for more.
I don’t think the post-modern part is true, however. Candidates for office have been in the post-modern mode for a long time now. I remember even Steve Forbes remarking on his "message," as if he were himself a political commentator describing the success of his own candidacy, rather than the candidate actually making his own pitch.
But the post-modern mode, one might call it, infects much more than just political reporting. One can find it all over liberal punditry–never making an argument, merely remarking on arguments made.
One thought on ““Post modern””
I’ve only just stumbled upon your fine, fine blog, but already my loins are on fire. Who are you? And where did you get this fabulous toolbar for your comment box? Truly, this is one of the best boxes I think I’ve ever seen — and that’s saying a hell of a lot, I assure you — and also one of the best toolbars I’ve ever come across, which indeed is saying a lot, because I’ve come across some stellar toolbars in my life. Anent your final paragraph, you could not be more right. If you’re at all interested in seeing specifically some of the ways in which postmodernism "infects," as you say, "much more than just political reporting," please read my modest post on the subect. I’d be delighted to have you, honestly. Best of all possible regards, Miss Priss
Comments are closed.