Representative Diane Black (R-TN) was on the PBS News Hour on Friday defending the new TrumpCare bill making its way through Congress. The bill’s getting criticism from both the Left and the Right. In particular, host Judy Woodruff asked Black about how the bill’s supporters answer the objection from Small Government Republicans that TrumpCare is yet another entitlement program, because it provides refundable tax credits.
JUDY WOODRUFF: But, as you know, your conservative colleagues are saying they see it’s a government guarantee and they don’t like it.
REP. DIANE BLACK: Well, they have that opportunity to make those comments and make their points.
And that’s what the whole process is about. That’s the great thing about being in the legislature, is a lot of good discussion and sometimes really heavy conversations. But I think, at the end of the day, that you’re going to see that this bill is going to be successful, and that’s because our health care system right now is failing.
But that’s not an answer to an objection. That’s the promise that there will be a discussion where the objection can be posed. Not what the answer will be to it.
Aristotle called this kind of move ‘ignorance of the nature of refutation’ — that in order to reply to a challenge, one must provide not only an argument, but one that addresses the issue instead of establishing (perhaps well) another point. Hence ignoratio elenchi, ignoring the argument.
In this case, Black’s strategy is to make a reasonable point about the process of argument, but proposing that the reasonable point about the process stands in for a reasonable case for a particular product. And so, going meta, saying that we’ll have a fair conversation about this, is used as some reason to think that a particular view is defended.
The follow-up argument, by the way, that the bill will pass because the health care system is failing, is a false dilemma. In fact, those who criticize the bill hold that a DIFFERENT bill would be a better third option.