{"id":870,"date":"2008-09-19T09:01:08","date_gmt":"2008-09-19T13:01:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=870"},"modified":"2008-09-19T09:01:08","modified_gmt":"2008-09-19T13:01:08","slug":"good-enough-for-moses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=870","title":{"rendered":"Good enough for Moses"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Internet_troll\">Concern troll<\/a> Michael Gerson <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/09\/11\/AR2008091102842.html\">last week<\/a> whined about how liberals have made light of Sarah Palin&#39;s Pentecostalism.&nbsp; While&#39;s he&#39;s right that this might alienate religious people&#8211;the very same who brought you all things that are awesome (abolitionism and civil rights) and none of the things that are bad, (like colonialism, slavery, etc.)&#8211;whose votes the Democrats need this coming year.<\/p>\n<p>It has been (correctly) pointed out elsewhere that his argument amounts to a straw man.&nbsp; No one has made fun of Palin&#39;s anything (her family, her religion).&nbsp; No one, that is, who represesents the Obama campaign or the Democratic party.&nbsp; If Gerson wants to be believed, he ought at least to have the honesty to name someone, someone representative (not Matt Damon) who is guilty of making light of Palin&#39;s religion.&nbsp; Saying &quot;liberals&quot; has a kind of Hannity\/O&#39;Reilly\/Will kind of falsity about it, as if we&#39;re supposed to take his word for it, even though he is in many respects the ultimate partisan hack, as he was the former speechwriter for George W. Bush.<\/p>\n<p>Not finished making stuff up (i.e., lying), Gerson continues sermonizing:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>But it is the political effect of these attacks that must have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/related\/topic\/John+McCain?tid=informline\">Team McCain<\/a> shouting and hollering with the joy of a frontier camp meeting. In general, <strong>liberal political and media elites demonstrate a religious diversity that runs the spectrum from secularism to liberal Episcopalianism &#8212; all the varied shades from violet to blue. Yet they assume their high church or Mencken-like disdain for religious enthusiasm is broadly shared.<\/strong> It was the sociologist Peter Berger who observed, &quot;Puerto Ricans, Jews and Episcopalians each form around 2 percent of the American population. Guess which group does not think of itself as a minority.&quot;&nbsp; <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>This sounds like one of the perpetual and unfounded screeds about the evils of secularism one might hear at one&#39;s church when one goes once in a great while.&nbsp; It&#39;s a gross misrepresentation of liberalism, as Gerson knows, and a gross misrepresentation of secularism, as Gerson ought to know.&nbsp; Both of those misrepresentations, of course, amount to dishonest portrayals of one&#39;s interlocutor.&nbsp; Such behavior does not advance us on the road to understanding. &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Concern troll Michael Gerson last week whined about how liberals have made light of Sarah Palin&#39;s Pentecostalism.&nbsp; While&#39;s he&#39;s right that this might alienate religious people&#8211;the very same who brought you all things that are awesome (abolitionism and civil rights) and none of the things that are bad, (like colonialism, slavery, etc.)&#8211;whose votes the Democrats &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=870\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Good enough for Moses<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=870"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/870\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}