{"id":670,"date":"2008-05-16T10:27:47","date_gmt":"2008-05-16T14:27:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=670"},"modified":"2008-05-16T10:27:47","modified_gmt":"2008-05-16T14:27:47","slug":"youre-no-mlk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=670","title":{"rendered":"You&#8217;re no MLK"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Guess who <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/05\/15\/AR2008051503576.html\">this<\/a> is:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Like other American heroes . . . . [NAME] was not a simple figure. He inclined toward democratic socialism as the answer to poverty. In his opposition to the Vietnam War, he called America &quot;the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today&quot; and thundered that God might &quot;break the backbone&quot; of American power. Toward the end of his short life &#8212; after years of fire hoses and attack dogs, wiretaps and bomb threats &#8212; [NAME] became increasingly isolated and depressed. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Sounds like the Reverend Jeremiah Wright&#8211;or someone equally &quot;angry.&quot;&nbsp; But no, it&#39;s Martin Luther King.&nbsp;  One might be tempted from such a description to rethink the universal condemnation of Reverend Wright.&nbsp; In his own context, Martin Luther King said some pretty astounding things about God&#39;s judgment of American arrogance.&nbsp; But where one might draw lessons from history, Michael Gerson sees only differences.&nbsp; People other than King, you know, the people like the Reverend Wright (Gerson oddly doesn&#39;t use any of Wright&#39;s words in this piece on why he&#39;s no MLK), are unamerican. <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p> Under King&#39;s leadership, the civil rights movement affirmed several principles: a belief that Providence favors justice and forbids despair; a belief that even the most bigoted whites have a core of humanity that might be touched and redeemed; a belief that American ideals were the ultimate answer to America&#39;s sins. <\/p>\n<p> These beliefs were often criticized by King&#39;s contemporaries such as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/related\/topic\/Malcolm+X?tid=informline\">Malcolm X<\/a> (who dismissed the 1963 March on Washington as the &quot;Farce on Washington&quot;) and Stokely Carmichael (who argued that voting rights were &quot;irrelevant to the lives of black people&quot;). And these beliefs remain controversial with leaders such as Wright and professor James Cone, the father of black liberation theology. &quot;Black theology,&quot; wrote Cone, &quot;will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.&quot; <\/p>\n<p>The problem with this approach is not that it is political, or even liberal &#8212; the African American church has generally been both. The problem is that it leads to a dead end of anger, conspiracy theories and futility. And it ignores the deeper radicalism of the American experiment &#8212; <strong>the radicalism of full citizenship and justice for every American<\/strong> &#8212; that inspired King, and that will inspire others. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The problem with Wright, you see, is that he seems to claim that the American experiment (when will people stop saying that?&nbsp; The experiment is over by now) hasn&#39;t produced &quot;full citizenship and justice for every American.&quot;&nbsp; How dare he. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Guess who this is: Like other American heroes . . . . [NAME] was not a simple figure. He inclined toward democratic socialism as the answer to poverty. In his opposition to the Vietnam War, he called America &quot;the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today&quot; and thundered that God might &quot;break the backbone&quot; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=670\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">You&#8217;re no MLK<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,1,72,141],"tags":[176,151],"class_list":["post-670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-begging-the-question","category-general","category-michael-gerson","category-specious-comparisons","tag-martin-luther-king","tag-wright"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=670"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}