{"id":639,"date":"2008-04-10T07:56:02","date_gmt":"2008-04-10T11:56:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=639"},"modified":"2008-04-10T20:08:13","modified_gmt":"2008-04-11T00:08:13","slug":"youre-living-in-the-past-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=639","title":{"rendered":"You&#8217;re living in the past"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m impressed by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/04\/09\/AR2008040903404.html\">Michael Gerson&#8217;s<\/a> attempt to turn someone&#8217;s having been right about something into a liability.&nbsp; He concedes the point that Obama has been right about Iraq in the past&#8211;it seems, according to Gerson (himself one of the chief rhetorical motivators for invading Iraq), that invading Iraq was a colossally bad idea.&nbsp; (Good for him, good Christian that he is.&nbsp; But there ought to be some penance involved in that admission&#8211;especially on account of the key role he played in making it a reality.&nbsp; Maybe he ought not to seek the credulity of the reading public.&nbsp; But I digress.) <\/p>\n<p>Back to the argument.&nbsp; Since Obama cites having been right about Iraq as a credential when he now argues about Iraq, he&#8217;s &quot;living in the past.&quot;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The situation in Iraq, as Gen. Petraeus insists, is &quot;fragile and<br \/>\nreversible.&quot; But the debate has moved far beyond a candidate&#8217;s initial<br \/>\nsupport for the war. This has led to an odd inversion of the<br \/>\ngenerational battle. Young Obama&#8217;s strongest arguments are focused &quot;on<br \/>\nthe failures of the past.&quot; The older man, by insisting on victory, is<br \/>\nmore responsible and realistic about the future. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>This has the air of a sophism about it.&nbsp; Judgments about the future rely on the past in two ways.&nbsp; (a) One who has a record of being right in the past will justifiably point that out as a credential; (b) what is going to happen can only be determined on the grounds of what has happened.&nbsp; So naturally in order to decide resolve what to do in Iraq, one will have to focus on the failure of the past&#8211;failures, Obama would point out, John McCain&#8217;s keen political judgment is responsible for.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>So the question, &quot;who is more responsible and realistic about the future&quot; depends, of course, on the past.&nbsp; For, &quot;who has been more responsible and realistic [on this specific problem, by the way] in the past?&quot; seems to be a rather reasonable way to resolve who will be more responsible in the future.<\/p>\n<p>But what do I know.&nbsp; I was right about Invading Iraq. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m impressed by Michael Gerson&#8217;s attempt to turn someone&#8217;s having been right about something into a liability.&nbsp; He concedes the point that Obama has been right about Iraq in the past&#8211;it seems, according to Gerson (himself one of the chief rhetorical motivators for invading Iraq), that invading Iraq was a colossally bad idea.&nbsp; (Good for &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=639\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">You&#8217;re living in the past<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[73,72],"tags":[112,114,1994,108,113],"class_list":["post-639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-inexplicable","category-michael-gerson","tag-iraq-war","tag-mccain","tag-michael-gerson","tag-obama","tag-wrong"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=639"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/639\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}