{"id":632,"date":"2008-04-02T14:22:58","date_gmt":"2008-04-02T18:22:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=632"},"modified":"2008-04-03T14:17:27","modified_gmt":"2008-04-03T18:17:27","slug":"impartial-birth-abortion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=632","title":{"rendered":"Impartial birth abortion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/04\/01\/AR2008040102197.html?hpid=opinionsbox1\">Gerson <\/a>today: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\nSen. Robert P. Casey Jr.&#8217;s endorsement of Barack Obama last week &#8212; &quot;I<br \/>\nbelieve in this guy like I&#8217;ve never believed in a candidate in my life&quot;<br \/>\n&#8212; recalled another dramatic moment in Democratic politics. In the<br \/>\nsummer of 1992, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/related\/topic\/Bill+Clinton?tid=informline\">Bill Clinton<\/a> solidified his control over the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/related\/topic\/U.S.+Democratic+Party?tid=informline\">Democratic Party<\/a>,<br \/>\nRobert P. Casey Sr., the senator&#8217;s father, was banned from speaking to<br \/>\nthe Democratic convention for the heresy of being pro-life.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nThe elder Casey (now deceased) was then the governor of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/related\/topic\/Pennsylvania?tid=informline\">Pennsylvania<\/a><br \/>\n&#8212; one of the most prominent elected Democrats in the country. He was<br \/>\nan economic progressive in the Roosevelt tradition. But his Irish<br \/>\nCatholic conscience led him to oppose abortion. So the Clintons chose<br \/>\nto humiliate him. It was a sign and a warning of much mean-spirited<br \/>\npettiness to come.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nThe younger Casey, no doubt, is a sincere fan of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/related\/topic\/Barack+Obama?tid=informline\">Obama<\/a>. He also must have found it satisfying to help along the cycle of political justice.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nBut by Casey&#8217;s father&#8217;s standard of social justice for the unborn, Obama is badly lacking.\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The first part is just false (as many have <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200611150013\">demonstrated<\/a>).&nbsp; Casey did not endorse the democratic candidates and so was not invited to speak at the podium.&nbsp; Later Gerson&#8211;some Christian he&#8211;goes on to distort a remark of Diane Feinstein.&nbsp; Gerson writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>These trends reached their logical culmination during a congressional<br \/>\ndebate on partial-birth abortion in 1999. When Democratic Sen. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/related\/topic\/Barbara+Boxer?tid=informline\">Barbara Boxer<\/a> was pressed to affirm that she opposed the medical killing of children <em>after<\/em><br \/>\nbirth, she refused to commit, saying that children deserve legal<br \/>\nprotection only &quot;when you bring your baby home.&quot; It was unclear whether<br \/>\nthis included the car trip.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Nice one, Gerson.&nbsp; Here&#8217;s what <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nrlc.org\/abortion\/pba\/notansweringboxersantorum.html\">Feinstein <\/a>actually said:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>I would make this statement: That this Constitution, as it<br \/>\ncurrently is &#8212; some of you want to amend it to say that life begins at<br \/>\nconception. I think <strong>when you bring your baby home, when your baby is born<\/strong> &#8212; and<br \/>\nthere is no such thing as partial-birth &#8212; the baby belongs to your family and<br \/>\nhas all the rights. But I am not willing to amend the Constitution to say that a<br \/>\nfetus is a person, which I know you would.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Gerson&#8217;s remark is clearly distorted.&nbsp; Dear Mr. Gerson, someone once said the truth will set you free. <\/p>\n<p>The last part, &quot;social justice for the unborn,&quot; is curious for another reason.&nbsp; Obama is pro-choice.&nbsp; As a result, he doesn&#8217;t think the unborn are the subjects of justice, as Gerson obviously does.&nbsp; Gerson goes on to argue:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>But Obama&#8217;s record on abortion is extreme. He opposed the ban on<br \/>\npartial-birth abortion &#8212; a practice a fellow Democrat, the late Daniel<br \/>\nPatrick Moynihan, once called &quot;too close to infanticide.&quot; Obama<br \/>\nstrongly criticized the Supreme Court decision upholding the<br \/>\npartial-birth ban. In the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/ac2\/related\/topic\/Illinois?tid=informline\">Illinois<\/a> state Senate, he opposed a bill similar to the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, which prevents the killing of infants mistakenly left alive by abortion. And now Obama has <strong>oddly <\/strong>claimed that he would not want his daughters to be &quot;punished with a baby&quot; because of a crisis<br \/>\npregnancy &#8212; hardly a welcoming attitude toward new life.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Obama doesn&#8217;t have a &quot;welcoming attitude&quot; (what that means baffles) toward new life <strong>because <\/strong>he&#8217;s pro-choice (and it turns out, by the way, that Gerson twisted Obama&#8217;s words&#8211;that&#8217;s three!).&nbsp; Gerson&#8217;s argument doesn&#8217;t do anything other than point out that Obama is pro-choice.&nbsp; But Gerson takes his having pointed this out as some kind of reason to think Obama is wrong.&nbsp; Maybe Obama&#8217;s view is wrong&#8211;but it&#8217;s not wrong <strong>because <\/strong>he holds&nbsp; it.&nbsp; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s Gerson today: Sen. Robert P. Casey Jr.&#8217;s endorsement of Barack Obama last week &#8212; &quot;I believe in this guy like I&#8217;ve never believed in a candidate in my life&quot; &#8212; recalled another dramatic moment in Democratic politics. In the summer of 1992, as Bill Clinton solidified his control over the Democratic Party, Robert P. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=632\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Impartial birth abortion<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,72,77],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-632","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","category-michael-gerson","category-unclassifiable"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/632","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=632"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/632\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=632"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=632"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}