{"id":5543,"date":"2020-07-21T12:16:54","date_gmt":"2020-07-21T17:16:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=5543"},"modified":"2020-07-21T12:16:54","modified_gmt":"2020-07-21T17:16:54","slug":"boycotts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=5543","title":{"rendered":"Boycotts"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/proxy\/H5oS2vV78ONPzGO4i4E4weqkKXwasLYMPi5Yjclgu_ndM2XbV1hcOWmvtRmanrmiL0pYaK1EeZyGy5I4_Xa4_KIIi1AT6055bFNa\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Sorry it&#8217;s been so long since we&#8217;ve posted anything; we&#8217;ve been very busy with other projects. For myself, and I&#8217;m sure Scott would agree, I just can&#8217;t give up on the idea of this blog&#8211;however flawed it might be and however infrequently I might post something.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Enough preamble,  let&#8217;s talk about boycotts.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/businessethicsblog.com\/2020\/07\/20\/is-a-boycott-an-act-of-violence\/\">Here&#8217;s a link <\/a>to a piece that raises interesting questions about boycotts and violence. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The basic thought seems to be that boycotts, as tools of political persuasion, exert force (by the withdrawal of economic support) to gain adherence to some perspective. Here is the conlcusion:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>Still, the question does give pause. Boycotts do occupy part of a spectrum of direct-action activities, understood as extra-legal activities designed to change someone\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s behaviour. They are attempts to go beyond rational persuasion to take matters into one\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s own hands, to force an outcome that one is unable or unwilling to argue for. Of course, that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s probably sometimes morally required. But it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not to be taken lightly.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>In argumentation this is what you&#8217;d call the ad baculum. I&#8217;ve been thinking about this for a bit (Here&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=5256\">a post<\/a> and you can read something longer <a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.uwindsor.ca\/ossaarchive\/OSSA12\/Wednesday\/16\/\">here<\/a> if you want). The basic idea of the ad baculum is that force isn&#8217;t (or shouldn&#8217;t be) a reason to conclude something. There&#8217;s quite a lot of literature on this, odd as that may seem. The basic struggle is how to account for the fallaciousness of the appeal to force. The standard textbook examples (unchanged through many editions) are hilarious. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I loathe to write a ton about this right now, but I would like to add one thought to the idea of ad baculums and violence (that I don&#8217;t think was raised in the piece). The boycott might be understood as a means to drawing attention to the reasons rather than an end in itself. So, perhaps people boycott product x not to bring about the end of x, but rather to call attention to the argument in question. To understand this you have to look at the audience as well as the target. So, when people boycott, perhaps they want people to ask: <em>why are they boycotting stuff?<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sorry it&#8217;s been so long since we&#8217;ve posted anything; we&#8217;ve been very busy with other projects. For myself, and I&#8217;m sure Scott would agree, I just can&#8217;t give up on the idea of this blog&#8211;however flawed it might be and however infrequently I might post something. Enough preamble, let&#8217;s talk about boycotts. Here&#8217;s a link &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=5543\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Boycotts<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5543","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5543","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5543"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5543\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5544,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5543\/revisions\/5544"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}