{"id":5058,"date":"2017-02-07T18:44:43","date_gmt":"2017-02-07T23:44:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=5058"},"modified":"2017-02-07T19:14:10","modified_gmt":"2017-02-08T00:14:10","slug":"weaponized-metalanguages","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=5058","title":{"rendered":"Weaponized metalanguages"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1zeBNnMDhVw\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pbs.twimg.com\/media\/C3vt9KTWcAAqVil.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1zeBNnMDhVw\">On Philosophy 15 (briefly discussed here yesterday<\/a>),\u00c2\u00a0Rob and Scott discussed the dialectical move from object language to meta-language (and then from meta-language to meta-meta-language, and so forth). They call this &#8220;weaponized metalanguage.&#8221; It&#8217;s a nice metaphor, despite its violence, because it captures the idea that the metalanguage of argument gets turned into a tool of argument itself. On a somewhat strained analogy, it&#8217;s a bit like using the rules of a game as part of the game (using the referee as a blocker in football, maybe).<\/p>\n<p>Scott and Rob are correct in their observation that a sizable part of political debate nowadays is almost entirely second-order&#8211;the subject is not the best policy option but rather what constitutes reasonable talk about what the best policy option is.<a href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/news\/opinion\/commentary\/ct-trump-voter-happy-deplorable-perspec-0206-md-20170203-story.html\"> For some people<\/a>, the election of Donald Trump is a fundamentally second order affair&#8211;&#8220;I voted for Trump because I&#8217;m tired of hearing people tell me what to think&#8230;.&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>The trouble with this strategy, however, is that there always seems to be a flanking maneuver available; there&#8217;s always one-level up. What constitutes reasonable basis for rules about talk about what the best policy option is.<\/p>\n<p>When that fails&#8211;as in the example above (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/im-a-liberal-and-i-want-milo-yiannopoulos-on-my-campus_us_5898a3dbe4b061551b3e011c?ncid=engmodushpmg00000004\">here&#8217;s an article on point<\/a>)&#8211;there&#8217;s always the tu quoque. \u00c2\u00a0My informal guess is that the &#8220;leveling up&#8221; is done mainly to allege the other person has violated some sort of norm. Naturally, accusers can&#8217;t be abusers, so the tu quoque is always an exit strategy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; On Philosophy 15 (briefly discussed here yesterday),\u00c2\u00a0Rob and Scott discussed the dialectical move from object language to meta-language (and then from meta-language to meta-meta-language, and so forth). They call this &#8220;weaponized metalanguage.&#8221; It&#8217;s a nice metaphor, despite its violence, because it captures the idea that the metalanguage of argument gets turned into a tool &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=5058\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Weaponized metalanguages<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2113,2112,910,2111],"class_list":["post-5058","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","tag-milo-yiannopolous","tag-philosophy-15","tag-tu-quoque-arguments","tag-weaponized-metalanguage"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5058","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5058"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5058\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5061,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5058\/revisions\/5061"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5058"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5058"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5058"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}