{"id":4991,"date":"2016-12-30T13:19:30","date_gmt":"2016-12-30T18:19:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=4991"},"modified":"2016-12-30T13:19:30","modified_gmt":"2016-12-30T18:19:30","slug":"crooked-hillary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=4991","title":{"rendered":"Crooked Hillary"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Not all arguments involve fundamental disagreements. Those that do, however, come along with a couple of challenges. One challenge regards the consequences of the disagreement. \u00c2\u00a0There are many, but I only want to talk about one. When A disagrees with B about some proposition\u00c2\u00a0<em>p<\/em> , then A impugns B&#8217;s competence, intelligence, or perhaps morality. That&#8217;s why people enter into such discussions in the first place&#8211;i.e., to levy these accusations and, hopefully, adjust the behavior or ideas of their interlocutor.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s frustrating to me, therefore, that people confuse these necessary concomitants of argument as somehow wrong or out of bounds. It&#8217;s especially frustrating when these people ought to know better. Here&#8217;s an example I stumbled over in the Chicago Tribune:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If Trump pursued the politics of resentment in courting white, working-class voters and their rural cousins, Democrats succumbed to what I call &#8220;the politics of righteousness&#8221; in overlooking their concerns and underestimating their power. By righteousness I mean the tendency of the Democratic Party <strong>to assume ownership of the moral high ground<\/strong> whenever cultural values and social norms are at issue in American politics \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and to presume that those who disagree are, as Hillary Clinton put it, &#8220;a basket of deplorables.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Aside from the false claims about &#8220;overlooking their concerns,&#8221; the assumption of &#8220;ownership of the moral high ground&#8221; is just what a debate about moral issues involves for Pete&#8217;s sake. What do you call people who call other people &#8220;Crooked Hillary&#8221;? That&#8217;s a moral position if there ever was one. Need we talk about abortion, gay marriage, or any of the other issues that are properly characterized as moral issues?<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a waste of time and energy to focus on garbage like this. We all take the moral high ground in moral debates where we hold some definite position. That&#8217;s how you play.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Not all arguments involve fundamental disagreements. Those that do, however, come along with a couple of challenges. One challenge regards the consequences of the disagreement. \u00c2\u00a0There are many, but I only want to talk about one. When A disagrees with B about some proposition\u00c2\u00a0p , then A impugns B&#8217;s competence, intelligence, or perhaps morality. That&#8217;s &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=4991\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Crooked Hillary<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2079,1739,2076,2078,2077],"class_list":["post-4991","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","tag-crooked-hillary","tag-disagreement","tag-kenneth-l-woodward","tag-moral-highground","tag-moral-issues"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4991","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4991"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4991\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4992,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4991\/revisions\/4992"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4991"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}