{"id":368,"date":"2007-04-22T10:03:00","date_gmt":"2007-04-22T14:03:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=368"},"modified":"2007-04-22T10:08:23","modified_gmt":"2007-04-22T14:08:23","slug":"what-is-a-war-anyway","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=368","title":{"rendered":"What is a war anyway?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/04\/20\/AR2007042001940.html\">Michael Chertoff<\/a>, Homeland security czar (that&#8217;s not what they call him, but they might as well), today writes an op-ed directed against some recent remarks of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter&#8217;s national security advisor.  Brzezinksi has claimed that we&#8217;re not involved in a &#8220;war&#8221; on terrorism; terrorism is a method, not a group or a state or a thing (like drugs).  Brzezinski argues that we have failed in the war on terror precisely because we have approached it as an actual (and not a metaphorical) war.  Rather than working to prevent terrorism, capture terrorists, and do the other things that will prevent more terrorism (like, and this is just a suggestion, capturing bin Laden), we have incorrectly militarized what is primarily a political issue.  Of course war is politics by other means, but Brzezinski&#8217;s argument is that we can&#8217;t achieve a military victory against a non-military enemy.  And, more than that, the enemy in this instance yearns for the authenticity and legitimization that only we can provide (by calling it a military war).     <\/p>\n<p>Leave it to Chertoff&#8211;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,1609777,00.html\">the one who lamented the possibility of &#8220;clean-skin&#8221; (i.e., white) terrorists<\/a>&#8211;to misunderstand Brezezinski&#8217;s point.  He writes: <\/p>\n<p>>Brzezinski stated the obvious in describing terrorism as a tactic, not an enemy [&#8220;Terrorized by &#8216;War on Terror,&#8217; Outlook, March 25]. But this misses the point. We are at war with a global movement and ideology whose members seek to advance totalitarian aims through terrorism<strong>. Brzezinski is deeply mistaken to mock the notion<\/strong> that we are at war and to suggest that we should adopt &#8220;more muted reactions&#8221; to acts of terrorism.<\/p>\n<p>Right&#8211;He doesn&#8217;t see the threat.  Now bring up Iran:<\/p>\n<p>>The impulse to minimize the threat we face is eerily reminiscent of the way America&#8217;s leaders played down the Ayatollah Khomeini&#8217;s revolutionary fanaticism in the late 1970s. That naive approach ultimately foundered on the kidnapping of our diplomats in Tehran.<\/p>\n<p>We were not and are not at war with Iran.  So that wasn&#8217;t a war either.  Analogies only work if things can be compared.  Sure, no serious person doubts that terrorists will do violent and awful things if they get a chance.  This doesn&#8217;t, however, make it a war.  And furthermore, calling what they do a war doesn&#8217;t change what they do.  It only changes what we do.  And what we&#8217;ve done so far has been an abysmal failure.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Michael Chertoff, Homeland security czar (that&#8217;s not what they call him, but they might as well), today writes an op-ed directed against some recent remarks of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter&#8217;s national security advisor. Brzezinksi has claimed that we&#8217;re not involved in a &#8220;war&#8221; on terrorism; terrorism is a method, not a group or a state &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=368\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">What is a war anyway?<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[42,1,3,12,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ad-hominem-abusive","category-general","category-politicians","category-straw-man","category-weak-analogy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}