{"id":3084,"date":"2011-08-10T01:07:44","date_gmt":"2011-08-10T06:07:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=3084"},"modified":"2011-08-10T00:04:40","modified_gmt":"2011-08-10T05:04:40","slug":"scare-quoque","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=3084","title":{"rendered":"Scare quoque"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Mallard Fillmore&#039;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.seattlepi.com\/comics-and-games\/fun\/Mallard_Fillmore\/2011-08-06\/\">recent take<\/a> on the President&#039;s rhetorical strategies:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Obama Scare tactics tu quoque.jpg\" style=\"width: 419px;height: 132px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This is an argument about arguments &#8212; namely, that scare tactics are bad, but it&#039;s worse to be a hypocrite about using them.&nbsp; So the score tally goes:&nbsp; Republicans -1 for using scare tactics, Obama +1 for chastising them for using the tactic.&nbsp; Obama -1 for using scare tactics, and -1 for being a hypocrite about using them.&nbsp; (And +1 for Fillmore for pointing out the scare tactic, and +1 for pointing out the hypocrisy.)<\/p>\n<p>Now, a question.&nbsp; Surely arguing that policy X will have bad consequences (or not following policy X will have the bad consequences) appeals to people&#039;s fears, but (a) so long as those things are bad and worth fearing, and (b) X is a crucial element in either avoiding or bringing about those consequences, aren&#039;t arguments from fear also good arguments from prudence?&nbsp; The scare tactic is not composed of simply pointing out that something bad will happen if we don&#039;t do something &#8212; it&#039;s comprised in shutting down discussion about what is the best way to avoid the bad consequences.&nbsp; Take for example the insurance salesman who says something like: <em>people your age often can get sick and die with no warning &#8212; that&#039;s why you need St. Bartholomew Insurance to take care of your family if that happens.<\/em>&nbsp; The fact of the sudden death may mean that you should get insurance, but it certainly doesn&#039;t mean that you should get St. Bartholomew Ins.&nbsp; We don&#039;t get why the Republicans or Obama are using scare tactics here, but it is a real question for us when we&#039;re being scared to accept a conclusion that doesn&#039;t follow.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mallard Fillmore&#039;s recent take on the President&#039;s rhetorical strategies: This is an argument about arguments &#8212; namely, that scare tactics are bad, but it&#039;s worse to be a hypocrite about using them.&nbsp; So the score tally goes:&nbsp; Republicans -1 for using scare tactics, Obama +1 for chastising them for using the tactic.&nbsp; Obama -1 for &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=3084\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Scare quoque<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,30,34,1109,1108,204],"tags":[1171,108,1112,801],"class_list":["post-3084","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tu-quoque","category-appeal-to-fearthreat","category-argument-analysis","category-argument-from-double-standards","category-argument-from-inconsistency","category-specious-allegations-of-fallacy","tag-mallard-fillmore","tag-obama","tag-scare-tactics","tag-tu-quoque-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3084","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3084"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3084\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3097,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3084\/revisions\/3097"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3084"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3084"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}