{"id":292,"date":"2007-01-15T10:31:10","date_gmt":"2007-01-15T14:31:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=292"},"modified":"2007-01-15T10:39:09","modified_gmt":"2007-01-15T14:39:09","slug":"there-are-good-arguments-on-both-sides","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=292","title":{"rendered":"There are good arguments on both sides"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The cop-out position frequently observed in student writing goes something like this: &#8220;there are good arguments on both sides, so in the end, who is to say. . .&#8221;.  But the only time in the history of philosophy where there were good arguments on both sides was the medieval debate about the eternity of the world.  <a href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/aristotle-metaphysics\/#SubEteImm\">The Philosopher<\/a> and many of his followers held by reason that it was eternal; <a href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/aquinas\/\">Scripture<\/a> teaches that it was created in time.  Who is to judge?<\/p>\n<p>Back here on earth, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/01\/14\/AR2007011400892.html\">Fred Hiatt<\/a> sees good arguments on both sides of a more mundane issue: who uses the troops as political props?  He writes:<\/p>\n<p>>The truth is, every side in the war debate uses the troops for political gain. When Bush tearfully presents the Medal of Honor to the family of a slain war hero the morning after announcing his latest strategy for Iraq, then flies off to Fort Benning, he is using the troops as props. Democrats didn&#8217;t make the absence of body armor a key campaign issue until they had done a lot of poll-testing.<\/p>\n<p>Hiatt puts three activities in the same category: (1) a tearful Medal of Honor award ceremony; (2) speeches before captive audiences; (3) arguments in favor of body-armor for the troops who are really being shot at.  Of these only the last has direct application to the reality of the welfare of the troops.  And poll-tested or not, no soldier ought to be sent into battle with inadequate body-armor (when better is available).  So, arguments about the welfare of the troops don&#8217;t belong in the same category as arguments in front of the troops (but not about them).  In the first two cases they are props; in the third they are the subject of the debate.  In all fairness, of course, no one would suggest that the awarding of the Medal of Honor was not genuine.  It&#8217;s just a different matter from the current and future welfare of those in harm&#8217;s way.  When things such as these don&#8217;t belong to the same category, you can&#8217;t compare them and claim that there are good arguments on both sides and so. . . <\/p>\n<p>>[a]s to the germaneness of the president&#8217;s tears or Barbara Boxer&#8217;s outrage, Americans can form their own judgments. .  .    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The cop-out position frequently observed in student writing goes something like this: &#8220;there are good arguments on both sides, so in the end, who is to say. . .&#8221;. But the only time in the history of philosophy where there were good arguments on both sides was the medieval debate about the eternity of the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=292\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">There are good arguments on both sides<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-292","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-op-ed-writers","category-plain-bad-arguments"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=292"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=292"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=292"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=292"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}