{"id":2523,"date":"2011-02-06T01:33:07","date_gmt":"2011-02-06T06:33:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=2523"},"modified":"2011-02-06T01:33:07","modified_gmt":"2011-02-06T06:33:07","slug":"low-expectations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=2523","title":{"rendered":"Low expectations"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bill O&#039;Reilly will be interviewing President Obama before the Superbowl.&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/townhall.com\/columnists\/billoreilly\/2011\/02\/05\/talking_with_the_president\">O&#039;Reilly doesn&#039;t want us to expect too much from him<\/a>.&nbsp; Interviewing the President is, like, hard.&nbsp; For one, you&#039;ve got all these rules about being respectful.&nbsp; You don&#039;t get to cut the President&#039;s mic if you don&#039;t like what he&#039;s saying, or interrupt him and call him a pinhead.&nbsp; Well, that&#039;s it:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>That&#039;s because the rules are different when it comes to interviewing the president of the United States. . . . For example, he is addressed as &quot;Mr. President.&quot; No one says &quot;Yo, Barack, how you doin&#039;?&quot; There is a respect for the office that formalizes all conversation.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Right.&nbsp; You don&#039;t open with &#039;Yo.&#039; But the point is that you don&#039;t undermine the dignity of the office, instead of make some lame attempt at racializing the president.&nbsp; Seriously, &#039;Yo&#039;.&nbsp; Yo.&nbsp; Right, so were the president Irish, you make a big deal about not starting your conversation with President O&#039;Malley with &quot;Blarney!&quot; or asking where he keeps his leprechauns.&nbsp; Methinks the pundit doth protest too much.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless, O&#039;Reilly prepares us for a subpar interview and a round of critical beatings of his interview.&nbsp; Instead of preparing his questions, he&#039;s preparing his rationalizations. <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>I fully expect to get hammered after the interview. Depending on how you feel about the president, the questions will either be too soft or too intrusive.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Nope.&nbsp; False dilemma. O&#039;Reilly can&#039;t even rationalize properly.&nbsp; The questions will not be either too soft or too intrusive.&nbsp; They will be too improperly formed.&nbsp; Too ideologically obtuse.&nbsp; Too pandering to an audience on the other side of the camera and not to the person to whom they are posed.&nbsp; Too&#8230; Fox.&nbsp; And they will be insufficiently intelligent, serious, or intelligible.&nbsp; They will be exactly what we expect from Bill O&#039;Reilly.&nbsp; Which means that our expectations will be low.&nbsp; Just as O&#039;Reilly has asked us to set them.&nbsp; Except for different reasons.&nbsp; Oh well, at least we&#039;re all prepared for his journalistic failure.&nbsp; The only problem is that too many will blame the President and his office for O&#039;Reilly&#039;s failure, not the interviewer.&nbsp; Sheesh, if O&#039;Reilly knew already that this interview wouldn&#039;t portray him in a good light, why did he agree to it in the first place?&nbsp; Doesn&#039;t the President know that O&#039;Reilly is important and that interviewing Presidents is hard on him and puts his career in danger?&nbsp; It is such a sacrifice, you know, interviewing a President when you know that you just can&#039;t win.&nbsp; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bill O&#039;Reilly will be interviewing President Obama before the Superbowl.&nbsp; O&#039;Reilly doesn&#039;t want us to expect too much from him.&nbsp; Interviewing the President is, like, hard.&nbsp; For one, you&#039;ve got all these rules about being respectful.&nbsp; You don&#039;t get to cut the President&#039;s mic if you don&#039;t like what he&#039;s saying, or interrupt him and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=2523\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Low expectations<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2523","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2523"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2523\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2524,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2523\/revisions\/2524"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2523"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}