{"id":2452,"date":"2011-01-10T12:49:21","date_gmt":"2011-01-10T17:49:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=2452"},"modified":"2011-01-10T12:57:19","modified_gmt":"2011-01-10T17:57:19","slug":"poes-law-and-straw-men","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=2452","title":{"rendered":"Poe&#8217;s Law and Straw Men"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/rationalwiki.org\/wiki\/Poe%27s_Law\">Poe&#039;s Law<\/a> is one of the many eponymous laws of the internet.&nbsp; It runs, roughly, that you can&#039;t tell the difference between religious crazies and people parodying religious crazies.&nbsp; And <em>vice versa<\/em>.&nbsp; That means that anything you find, for example, on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.landoverbaptist.org\/\">LandoverBaptist.com<\/a> you can find a <a href=\"http:\/\/sanemajority.com\/\">real religious nutcase who believes it and says it<\/a>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>If Poe&#039;s Law is true, then I think it would be very difficult for charges of straw-manning to stick.&nbsp; That is, no matter how crazy a view you can dream up about religion, you would likely be able to find someone who really holds that view. As a consequence, you&#039;d never really be distorting the dialectical situation with the issue &#8212; there&#039;s always someone dumber and crazier than you&#039;d anticipated.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>One thing to note, now, is that there&#039;s a difference between straw-manning and <a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=552\">weak-manning<\/a>.&nbsp; That is, it&#039;s one thing to distort what some speaker or another may say and it&#039;s another thing to take the weakest and dumbest versions of your opposition and refute only them.&nbsp; Straw-manning is the former, weak-manning is the latter.&nbsp; The point is that if Poe&#039;s Law is true, it may be impossible to straw man, but the dialectical terrain is littered with weak men.&nbsp; Your job is to sort them.<\/p>\n<p>My worry is that without that distinction between accurate but selectively inappropriate representations of one&#039;s opposition (<a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=2082\">nutpicking<\/a> one&#039;s versions of the opposition so they always are the dumb ones) and accurate and the best representations of one&#039;s opposition, we lose the thought that discourse is possible.&nbsp; If you think that Poe is true about the religious (that they&#039;re all borderline nutcases or people who are simply enablers of nutcases), then there&#039;s not much of a chance at reasoned exchange with them.&nbsp; Same goes for politics.&nbsp; That&#039;s bad.<\/p>\n<p>N.B.: Robert Talisse and I have a longer version of this thought over at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.3quarksdaily.com\/3quarksdaily\/2011\/01\/some-thoughts-about-poes-law.html#more\">3QuarksDaily<\/a>. I also have a longish essay on it up over at&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/vanderbilt.academia.edu\/ScottAikin\/Papers\/384374\/Poes_Law_Group_Polarization_and_Argumentative_Failure_in_Religious_and_Political_Discourse\">my website on Academia.edu<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Poe&#039;s Law is one of the many eponymous laws of the internet.&nbsp; It runs, roughly, that you can&#039;t tell the difference between religious crazies and people parodying religious crazies.&nbsp; And vice versa.&nbsp; That means that anything you find, for example, on LandoverBaptist.com you can find a real religious nutcase who believes it and says it.&nbsp; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=2452\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Poe&#8217;s Law and Straw Men<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,12,571],"tags":[895,1964,412],"class_list":["post-2452","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","category-straw-man","category-weak-man-straw-man-fallacies-of-relevance-fallacies-argument-problems","tag-poes-law","tag-straw-man","tag-weak-man"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2452","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2452"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2452\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2458,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2452\/revisions\/2458"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}