{"id":2233,"date":"2010-09-19T06:43:42","date_gmt":"2010-09-19T11:43:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=2233"},"modified":"2010-09-19T08:50:55","modified_gmt":"2010-09-19T13:50:55","slug":"some-arguments-by-analogy-are-like-trips-to-other-planets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=2233","title":{"rendered":"Some arguments by analogy are like slave uprisings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.humanevents.com\/article.php?id=39060\">Pat Buchanan<\/a> thinks the Republican Establishment doesn&#039;t respect the Tea Party or their candidates.&nbsp; Apparently, Republican Party Leaders had their preferred candidates (you know, ones that might win the general election), and they supported them in the primaries.&nbsp; And then these Tea Partiers come along, and well&#8230; win those primaries.&nbsp; Now it looks like the Dems may not get trounced quite so badly in November. Republican Establishment folks get mad, because they&#039;re trying to win elections, but a large segment of the party won&#039;t cooperate.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Now, this is evidence to me that there should just be two parties.&nbsp; Luckily, they&#039;ve already got two names picked out.&nbsp; But this isn&#039;t about me or where the evidence takes us.&nbsp; This is about the Tea Party and its, uh, spokespeople.&nbsp; Or something.&nbsp; Here&#039;s what Buchanan thinks this is about: <strong>exploitation.<\/strong>&nbsp; That&#039;s right, he thinks the Republican Establishment looks to conservatives and just tells them what to do, and they expect conservatives to just do it.&nbsp; And so, in Buchanan&#039;s mind, Tea Partiers are like slaves.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>To the Republican establishment, tea party people are field hands. Their labors are to be recognized and rewarded, but <strong>they are to stay off the porch and not presume to sit at the master&#039;s table<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Oh, &quot;field hands.&quot;&nbsp; Alright.&nbsp; So what follows?&nbsp; Well, Buchanan doesn&#039;t seem to be sure.&nbsp; He&#039;s sure that the Republican Establishment isn&#039;t fit to govern, as they are all &quot;neoconservatives,&quot; which means &quot;evil,&quot; these days.&nbsp; So is there going to be a Tea Party&#039;s version of Nat Turner?&nbsp; (Highly likely: Nat Turner=Sarah Palin. Look out.)&nbsp; Maybe they&#039;re waiting for the Emancipation Proclamation (though, I&#039;d bet they&#039;d have taken that, too, as a breach of the Constitution).&nbsp; Maybe they&#039;ll realize that they aren&#039;t really slaves, and they&#039;ll leave the plantation and start a commune where they&#039;re all equal, and everyone has a say, and everyone gets what they need.&nbsp; <em>Tea Partiers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pat Buchanan thinks the Republican Establishment doesn&#039;t respect the Tea Party or their candidates.&nbsp; Apparently, Republican Party Leaders had their preferred candidates (you know, ones that might win the general election), and they supported them in the primaries.&nbsp; And then these Tea Partiers come along, and well&#8230; win those primaries.&nbsp; Now it looks like the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=2233\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Some arguments by analogy are like slave uprisings<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[141,23],"tags":[732,2013,719],"class_list":["post-2233","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-specious-comparisons","category-weak-analogy","tag-argument-by-analogy","tag-pat-buchanan","tag-tea-party"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2233","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2233"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2233\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2238,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2233\/revisions\/2238"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2233"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2233"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2233"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}