{"id":1661,"date":"2009-10-24T07:46:16","date_gmt":"2009-10-24T13:46:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1661"},"modified":"2009-10-25T07:56:29","modified_gmt":"2009-10-25T13:56:29","slug":"its-good-to-be-a-gangster","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1661","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s good to be a gangster"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2009\/10\/23\/AR2009102303193.html?hpid=opinionsbox1\">George Will<\/a> defends the crazy:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>After six years in the state Legislature, she ran for Congress and now, in her second term, has become such a burr under Democrats&#39; saddles that recently the New York Times profiled her beneath a Page One headline: &quot;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/10\/15\/us\/politics\/15bachmann.html\"><font color=\"#0c4790\">GOP Has a Lightning Rod, and Her Name Is Not Palin<\/font><\/a>.&quot; She is, however, a petite pistol that occasionally goes off half-cocked. <\/p>\n<p>For example, appearing on MSNBC&#39;s &quot;Hardball&quot; 18 days before last year&#39;s election, she made the mistake of taking Chris Matthews&#39;s bait and <strong>speculating about whether Barack Obama and some other Democrats have &quot;anti-American&quot; views.<\/strong> In the ensuing uproar &#8212; fueled by people who were not comparably scandalized when George W. Bush was <strong>sulfurously vilified<\/strong> &#8212; her opponent raised nearly $2 million and her lead shrank from 13 points to her winning margin of three.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Well, as Will is fond of saying as he prepares an objection, the unspecified sulfurous vilification on the part of an&nbsp;unidentified some does not justify the loony-toons McCarthyism of a&nbsp;member of the United States House of Representatives.<\/p>\n<p>More funny, however, is Will&#39;s defense of Bachmann.&nbsp; He writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>Some of her supposed excesses<\/strong> are, however, not merely defensible, they are admirable. <strong>For example, her June 9 <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.c-spanarchives.org\/congress\/?q=node\/77531&amp;id=8994916\"><font color=\"#0c4790\"><strong>statement<\/strong><\/font><\/a><strong> on the House floor in which she spoke of &quot;gangster government&quot; has been viewed on the Internet about 2 million times.<\/strong> She noted that, during the federal takeover of General Motors, a Democratic senator and one of her Democratic House colleagues each successfully intervened with GM to save a constituent&#39;s dealership from forced closure. One of her constituents, whose dealership had been in the family for 90 years, told her that the $15 million dealership had been rendered worthless overnight, and, Bachmann said, &quot;<strong>GM<\/strong> is demanding that she hand over her customer list,&quot; probably to give it to surviving GM dealerships that once were competitors. <\/p>\n<p>In her statement, Bachmann repeatedly called such politicization of the allocation of economic rewards &quot;<strong>gangster government<\/strong>.&quot; <strong>And she repeatedly noted that the phrase was used by a respected political analyst, Michael Barone, principal co-author of the Almanac of American Politics, who coined it in connection with the mugging of GM bondholders in the politicized bankruptcy<\/strong>. Bachmann, like Barone, was accurate. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Some<\/strong> of Bachmann&#39;s excesses are defensible because (1) her speech on the house floor has been viewed 2 million times; (2) &quot;respected political analyst (<a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?s=barone\">and not definitely right wing hack<\/a>) Michael Barone coined the term she used repeatedly to describe the actions of a government run by a black guy.&nbsp; I wonder if the term would have been as effective if the President were a white guy from Texas.&nbsp; Probably not.&nbsp; To open up a parenthesis, here&#39;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usnews.com\/blogs\/barone\/2009\/03\/30\/republicans-are-normal-democrats-are-not.html\">Michael Barone on the Democratic party<\/a>&nbsp;(via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonmonthly.com\/archives\/individual\/2009_03\/017533.php\">Steve Benen<\/a>):<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>that the Republican Party is the party of people who are considered, by themselves and by others, as normal Americans&mdash;Northern white Protestants in the 19th century, married white Christians more recently<\/strong>&mdash;while the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usnews.com\/blogs\/barone\/2009\/03\/30\/republicans-are-normal-democrats-are-not.html#\" target=\"_new\" onclick=\"adlinkMouseClick(event,this,3);\"><font color=\"#005497\"><span style=\"position: relative; font-family: Georgia, &#39;Times New Roman&#39;, Times, serif; color: #005497 !important; font-weight: 400\" class=\"kLink\">Democratic <\/span><span style=\"position: relative; font-family: Georgia, &#39;Times New Roman&#39;, Times, serif; color: #005497 !important; font-weight: 400\" class=\"kLink\">Party<\/span><\/font><\/a> is the party of the out groups who are in some sense seen, by themselves and by others, as not normal&mdash;white Southerners and Catholic immigrants in the 19th century, blacks and white seculars more recently. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Ah, normality&#8211;certainly a guy with views like that would mean gangster only in the most innocuous way.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Anyway, back to the point.&nbsp; One might concede that the bankruptcy of GM was politicized.&nbsp; That&#39;s like the discovery of hot water.&nbsp; Is it proper to describe political actions you don&#39;t agree with&nbsp;as a &quot;mugging&quot; or &quot;gangster&quot;?&nbsp; I don&#39;t think so.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>UPDATE: turns out the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonmonthly.com\/archives\/individual\/2009_10\/020609.php\">&quot;gangster government&quot; allegation was shown to be false<\/a> a mere two days after it was made.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>George Will defends the crazy: After six years in the state Legislature, she ran for Congress and now, in her second term, has become such a burr under Democrats&#39; saddles that recently the New York Times profiled her beneath a Page One headline: &quot;GOP Has a Lightning Rod, and Her Name Is Not Palin.&quot; She &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1661\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">It&#8217;s good to be a gangster<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[42,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ad-hominem-abusive","category-will"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1661\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}