{"id":1500,"date":"2009-06-15T05:41:34","date_gmt":"2009-06-15T11:41:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1500"},"modified":"2009-06-15T07:00:42","modified_gmt":"2009-06-15T13:00:42","slug":"morally-hazardrous","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1500","title":{"rendered":"Morally hazardrous"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Health care is the topic of the day.&nbsp; People seem to agree that 46 million people don&#39;t have any at all.&nbsp; People also tend to forget that having health insurance is not necessarily protection against going into bankruptcy.&nbsp; For that matter, having health insurance for many does not entail they will get better care than those without, or any care at all.&nbsp; It is generally agreed, however, that Americans spend more and get less per dollar than their counterparts in other developed nations.&nbsp; That doesn&#39;t worry <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2009\/06\/14\/AR2009061402444.html\">Robert Samuelson<\/a>, however.&nbsp; Nor does he bother to mention that astounding fact.&nbsp; He writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>How much healthier today&#39;s uninsured would be with that coverage is unclear.<\/strong> They already receive health care &#8212; $116 billion worth in 2008, estimates Families USA, an advocacy group. Some is paid by the uninsured themselves (37 percent), some by government and charities (26 percent). The remaining &quot;uncompensated care&quot; is either absorbed by doctors and hospitals or shifted to higher private insurance premiums. <strong>Some<\/strong> uninsured would benefit from coverage, but others wouldn&#39;t. Either they&#39;re healthy (40 percent are between ages 18 and 34) or <strong>would get ineffective care<\/strong>.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The claim&#8211;how much <strong>healthier<\/strong> would the uninsured be&#8211;is quickly replaced by financial observations on how much care they do receive and who pays (and, oddly, whether this care would be any good).&nbsp; That, I think, is misleading.&nbsp; Certainly, uninsured teenagers who never have accidents and don&#39;t get sick wouldn&#39;t benefit at all from health <strong>care<\/strong>, but we&#39;re not talking about health care, we&#39;re talking about health <strong>insurance<\/strong>.&nbsp; Not having health <strong>insurance<\/strong> is different from not having access to health care.&nbsp; Most Americans, as John Stossel once pointed out (see &quot;Is America Still Number One?&quot;&#8211;the answer, would you believe it, was &quot;yes&quot;), have access to the best health care in the world (!!!).&nbsp; Too bad, however, the question regarded <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amjmed.com\/article\/S0002-9343(09)00404-5\/abstract\">whether they or anyone could pay for it<\/a>.&nbsp; To that, the answer is &quot;obviously not.&quot;&nbsp; &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Aside from the red-herring like shift in topics, Samuelson abuses the quantifier &quot;some.&quot;&nbsp; Indeed, some&#8211;those who don&#39;t get hurt&#8211;would not benefit from coverage.&nbsp; For the past three years I was one who benefited not from coverage.&nbsp; Yet about a week ago, fate had it that I would begin to need to benefit.&nbsp; You never really know when that will be.&nbsp; A friend of mine in graduate school was young, healthy and uninsured.&nbsp; A headache one day cost him 25,000 dollars. &nbsp; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Health care is the topic of the day.&nbsp; People seem to agree that 46 million people don&#39;t have any at all.&nbsp; People also tend to forget that having health insurance is not necessarily protection against going into bankruptcy.&nbsp; For that matter, having health insurance for many does not entail they will get better care than &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1500\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Morally hazardrous<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,71],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1500","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-red-herring","category-robert-samuelson"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1500","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1500"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1500\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1500"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1500"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1500"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}