{"id":1429,"date":"2009-04-30T08:40:23","date_gmt":"2009-04-30T14:40:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1429"},"modified":"2009-04-30T08:40:56","modified_gmt":"2009-04-30T14:40:56","slug":"shut-him-down","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1429","title":{"rendered":"Shut him down"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Once again someone needs to explain to Fred Hiatt, editorial page editor of the Washington Post, the importance of making &quot;inferences.&quot;&nbsp; Yesterday in an online chat session (<a href=\"http:\/\/tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com\/2009\/04\/hiatt_george_wills_critics_are_trying_to_shut_him.php\">courtesy of TPM<\/a>) there was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/discussion\/2009\/04\/27\/DI2009042702249.html?hpid=opinionsbox1\">the following exchange between Hiatt and a reader<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Boston: This doesn&#39;t relate to Obama but would you care to address the whole George Will global warming column controversy? Is there any concern that lax standards for accuracy hurts the prestige of <em>The Post<\/em> opinion page more generally?  <\/p>\n<p>Fred Hiatt: Happy to, because we don&#39;t have lax standards for accuracy. He addressed the factual challenges to his column in detail in a later column. In general we do careful fact checking. <strong>What people have mostly objected to is not that his data are wrong but that he draws wrong inferences<\/strong>. I would think folks would be eager to engage in the debate, given how sure they are of their case, <strong>rather than trying to shut him down<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>We have talked about this issue <a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1354\">here<\/a> and  <a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/\/?p=1220\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/\/?p=1232\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/\/?p=1235\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/\/?p=1241\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/\/?p=1244\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/\/?p=1267\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/\/?p=1269\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/\/?p=1289\">here<\/a>).&nbsp; Two quick things.&nbsp; First, &quot;inferences&quot; in this case are part of the &quot;facts.&quot;&nbsp; As one arrives at all &quot;facts&quot; other than perhaps those immediately obvious to you, by &quot;inferences.&quot;&nbsp; Believe it or not, I make an &quot;inference&quot; regarding all facts about the past.&nbsp; I ate breakfast this morning, I so conclude, on account of the fact that there is an empty bowl of cereal with spoon in it on my desk.&nbsp; Ok that is an easy one, but you get the point.&nbsp; It is a fact that I ate breakfast, but it is a fact I believe on account of the evidence for it.&nbsp; So it&#39;s not so easy to separate &quot;facts&quot; from &quot;inferences.&quot;&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Second, I would argue that the Post excludes people with &quot;inferences&quot; all of the time&#8211;and rightly so.&nbsp; The Holocaust denier can claim merely to be making historical &quot;inferences&quot; between &quot;facts&quot;.&nbsp; Such inferences are preposterous, of course.&nbsp; Drawing this distinction, in other words, is absurd. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Once again someone needs to explain to Fred Hiatt, editorial page editor of the Washington Post, the importance of making &quot;inferences.&quot;&nbsp; Yesterday in an online chat session (courtesy of TPM) there was the following exchange between Hiatt and a reader: Boston: This doesn&#39;t relate to Obama but would you care to address the whole George &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1429\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Shut him down<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[484,521,520,129,457,522,1991,453],"class_list":["post-1429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-will","tag-climate-change","tag-facts","tag-fred-hiatt","tag-george-will","tag-global-warming-denialism","tag-inferences","tag-logic","tag-washington-post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1429"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1429\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}