{"id":1289,"date":"2009-03-03T06:55:05","date_gmt":"2009-03-03T12:55:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1289"},"modified":"2009-07-23T07:12:11","modified_gmt":"2009-07-23T13:12:11","slug":"choose-your-own-facts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1289","title":{"rendered":"Choose your own facts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Everyone has heard the expression, &quot;you can choose your own something or other, but not your own facts.&quot;&nbsp; Well, in a way, no.&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2009\/02\/27\/AR2009022702334.html\">Here&#39;s<\/a> the way, according to Washington Post&#39;s Ombudsman, Andrew Alexander: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>Opinion columnists are free to choose whatever facts bolster their arguments.<\/strong> But they aren&#39;t free to distort them.<\/p>\n<p>The question of whether that happened is at the core of an uproar over a recent George F. Will column and The Post&#39;s fact-checking process.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>That sounds wrong to me.&nbsp; Two quick reasons.&nbsp; First, there seems to be a question of scale.&nbsp; If we have three facts that support a claim, and 97 which don&#39;t, an opinion columnist at the post is free to argue talk about the three to the exclusion of the 97.&nbsp; Let&#39;s say, for instance, that one tiny piece of evidence (of dubious origin) holds that a certain person is guilty of a crime, yet a pile of evidence shows the opposite.&nbsp; The Post&#39;s Ombudsman thinks it would be fine to mention the one piece, and not the others, creating the impression that the preponderance evidence leans the other way. <\/p>\n<p>Second, we have a question of context.&nbsp; Facts have a context in which they are true.&nbsp; In <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2009\/02\/13\/AR2009021302514.html\">George Will&#39;s recent column<\/a> (which after all is the occasion for this piece), he alleges&#8211;and this is the foundation for his argument&#8211;that there was a global cooling hysteria in the 1970s.&nbsp; This may be true of the popular media, but it wasn&#39;t true of scientists (who argued that the climate was warming).&nbsp; There&#39;s a fact, sort of I guess, with no context producing a rather misleading inference.&nbsp; This is especially true if the audience does not have a very clear grasp of the background information (which information makes Will&#39;s columns appear ridiculous).&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Choosing your own facts, in other words, can be a method of distortion, and, in this case it was.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Everyone has heard the expression, &quot;you can choose your own something or other, but not your own facts.&quot;&nbsp; Well, in a way, no.&nbsp; Here&#39;s the way, according to Washington Post&#39;s Ombudsman, Andrew Alexander: Opinion columnists are free to choose whatever facts bolster their arguments. But they aren&#39;t free to distort them. The question of whether &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1289\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Choose your own facts<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,73,58,54],"tags":[462,463,129,461],"class_list":["post-1289","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-will","category-inexplicable","category-lack-of-evidence","category-things-that-are-false","tag-andrew-alexander","tag-cherry-picking-facts","tag-george-will","tag-washington-post-ombudsman"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1289","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1289"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1289\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1289"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1289"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1289"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}