{"id":1051,"date":"2008-12-01T08:26:58","date_gmt":"2008-12-01T12:26:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1051"},"modified":"2008-12-01T09:25:44","modified_gmt":"2008-12-01T13:25:44","slug":"strategery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1051","title":{"rendered":"Strategery"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Much like everyone else, terrorists aim to achieve an objective.&nbsp; They are not extra-rational, off-the-charts insane, quite often the contrary.&nbsp; They are capable of some rather cold calculation.&nbsp; The colder the better (for them).&nbsp; The immediate objective of most terrorist acts is to bring violence upon people.&nbsp; Who the people are doesn&#39;t necessarily matter.&nbsp; But the second objective of the terrorist is that the response to their terrorism further their cause.&nbsp; So if terrorists from region x or ethnicity y or religion z kill a bunch of people of a different region, ethnicity, or religion, they want as their second objective indiscriminate violence to be brought upon them and their non-terrorist fellows.&nbsp; That violence will create more sympathy for their cause, more terrorists, and so forth.&nbsp; Why?&nbsp; Because that violence (1) legitimizes their cause; (2) treats them as combatants, in a war, which is what they want.&nbsp; Someone explain this to that maniac Bill Kristol, who just does not get it.&nbsp; He <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/12\/01\/opinion\/01kristol.html?ref=opinion\">writes<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p> Consider first an op-ed article in Sunday&rsquo;s Los Angeles Times by Martha Nussbaum, a well-known professor of law and ethics at the University of Chicago. The article was headlined &ldquo;Terrorism in India has many faces.&rdquo; But one face that Nussbaum fails to mention specifically is that of Lashkar-e-Taiba, the Islamic terror group originating in Pakistan that seems to have been centrally involved in the attack on Mumbai.<\/p>\n<p><strong>This is because Nussbaum&rsquo;s main concern is not explaining or curbing Islamic terror.<\/strong> Rather, she writes that &ldquo;if, as now seems likely, last week&rsquo;s terrible events in Mumbai were the work of Islamic terrorists, that&rsquo;s more bad news for India&rsquo;s minority Muslim population.&rdquo; She deplores past acts of Hindu terror against India&rsquo;s Muslims. She worries about Muslim youths being rounded up on suspicion of terrorism with little or no evidence. And she notes that this is &ldquo;an analogue to the current ugly phenomenon of racial profiling in the United States.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Quite the contrary.&nbsp; Nussbaum&#39;s goal, unlike Kristol&#39;s, is not to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theonion.com\/content\/node\/34500\">create more terrorists<\/a> by treating every muslim as complicit in the actions a few.&nbsp; Kristol&#39;s bloodthirsty cluelessness is in even greater evidence in the following passage:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p> Jim Leach is also a professor, at Princeton, but he&rsquo;s better known as a former moderate Republican congressman from Iowa who supported Barack Obama this year. His contribution over the weekend was to point out on Politico.com that &ldquo;the Mumbai catastrophe underscores the importance of vocabulary.&rdquo; This wouldn&rsquo;t have been my first thought. But Leach believes it&rsquo;s very important that we consider the Mumbai attack not as an act of &ldquo;war&rdquo; but as an act of &ldquo;barbarism.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> Why? &ldquo;The former implies a cause: a national or tribal or ethnic rationale that infuses a sacrificial action with some group&rsquo;s view of heroism; the latter is an assault on civilized values, everyone&rsquo;s. &#8230; To the degree barbarism is a part of the human condition, Mumbai must be understood <strong>not just as an act related to a particular group but as an outbreak of pent-up irrationality that can occur anywhere, anytime<\/strong>. &#8230; It may be true that the perpetrators viewed themselves as somehow justified in attacking Indians and visiting foreigners, particularly perhaps Americans, British and Israeli nationals. But a response that is the least nationalistic is likely to be the most effective.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p> If, as Leach says, &ldquo;it may be true&rdquo; the perpetrators viewed themselves as justified in their attacks, <strong>doesn&rsquo;t this mean that they did in fact have a &ldquo;rationale&rdquo; that &ldquo;infused&rdquo; their action?<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Leach&#39;s point is that these terrorists should not be characterized as legitimate political agents involved in a war with the West of us.&nbsp; Of course they have a rationale, and a purpose, but it&#39;s one that ought not to be entertained by granting them privilege of our bombs. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Much like everyone else, terrorists aim to achieve an objective.&nbsp; They are not extra-rational, off-the-charts insane, quite often the contrary.&nbsp; They are capable of some rather cold calculation.&nbsp; The colder the better (for them).&nbsp; The immediate objective of most terrorist acts is to bring violence upon people.&nbsp; Who the people are doesn&#39;t necessarily matter.&nbsp; But &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1051\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Strategery<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,12,56],"tags":[242,401,348],"class_list":["post-1051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ignoratio-elenchi","category-straw-man","category-william-kristol","tag-bill-kristol","tag-martha-nussbaum","tag-terrorism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1051"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1051\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}