{"id":1034,"date":"2008-11-27T10:18:21","date_gmt":"2008-11-27T14:18:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1034"},"modified":"2008-11-27T13:40:49","modified_gmt":"2008-11-27T17:40:49","slug":"job-market","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1034","title":{"rendered":"Job Market"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Anyone who has gone through the relentless misery known as the <a href=\"http:\/\/leiterreports.typepad.com\/blog\/2008\/11\/smoking-habit-a.html\">academic job market<\/a> knows that one&#39;s political affiliations are the farthest thing from one&#39;s mind (and the least likely subject of conversation at any of one&#39;s many interviews).&nbsp; One worries rather about the really long CV of one&#39;s competitors.&nbsp; Having gone through that myself, I can say that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/11\/26\/AR2008112603249.html\">George Will<\/a>&#39;s whining about ideological imbalance in the humanities is uninformed and silly.&nbsp; Speaking of a recent and most likely annoying book by Stanley Fish, he suggests that one ought to study the causes and consequences of there being so many lefties in academia.&nbsp; Laying out his case for affirmative action for conservatives, Will writes:&nbsp; <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p> Fish does not dispute the fact that large majorities of humanities and social science professors are on the left. But about <strong>the causes and consequences of this<\/strong>, he airily says: It is all &quot;too complicated&quot; to tell in his book, other than to say that the G.I. Bill began the inclusion of &quot;hitherto underrepresented and therefore politically active&quot; groups. <\/p>\n<p>Then, promiscuously skewering straw men, he says, &quot;these were not planned events&quot; and universities do not &quot;resolve&quot; to hire liberals and there is no &quot;vast left-wing conspiracy&quot; and inquiring into a job applicant&#39;s politics is not &quot;allowed&quot; and &quot;the fact of a predominantly liberal faculty says nothing necessarily about what the faculty teaches.&quot; Note Fish&#39;s obfuscating &quot;necessarily.&quot; <\/p>\n<p><strong>The question is not whether the fact &quot;necessarily&quot; says something about teaching but whether the fact really does have pedagogic consequences.<\/strong> About the <strong>proliferation<\/strong> of race and gender courses, programs and even departments, Fish says there are two relevant questions: Are there programs &quot;with those names that are more political than academic?&quot; And do such programs &quot;have to be more political than academic?&quot; He says the answer to the first is yes, to the second, no. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The &quot;consequences,&quot; however, of this phenomenon have been studied.&nbsp; Turns out, say some, students are unlikely to be indoctrinated.&nbsp; I know I say this a lot, but I&#39;m tired of being called an indoctrinator: I can&#39;t even indoctrinate my students to underline or italicize the title of that leftist handbook, <em>The Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics<\/em>.&nbsp; When they get that, perhaps will move on to my views about race and gender.&nbsp; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Anyone who has gone through the relentless misery known as the academic job market knows that one&#39;s political affiliations are the farthest thing from one&#39;s mind (and the least likely subject of conversation at any of one&#39;s many interviews).&nbsp; One worries rather about the really long CV of one&#39;s competitors.&nbsp; Having gone through that myself, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/?p=1034\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Job Market<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,62,54],"tags":[394,129,1988],"class_list":["post-1034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-will","category-stanley-fish","category-things-that-are-false","tag-academic-indoctrination","tag-george-will","tag-stanley-fish"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1034\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenonsequitur.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}