Some look to the pundit class for guidance on the complex and confusing issues of the day. At the cost of several thousands of dollars, this is what David Brooks offers his readers:
Socially liberal knowledge workers naturally want to see people like themselves at the head of society, not people who used to run Halliburton and who are supported by a vast army of evangelicals.
Two things. What does "naturally" mean here? Once that's clear, what is "the head of society" in a democracy such as ours?