In case one is interested in bad arguments in general–as we are–then one can go badarguments.org to practice identifying them. Have fun.
Finally, if one has been following George F. Will's scientific escapades (discussed by us here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here), one might be interested in the following article published in yesterday's Washington Post. Here's a critical passage:
The new evidence — including satellite data showing that the average multiyear wintertime sea ice cover in the Arctic in 2005 and 2006 was nine feet thick, a significant decline from the 1980s — contradicts data cited in widely circulated reports by Washington Post columnist George F. Will that sea ice in the Arctic has not significantly declined since 1979.
If only the article were distributed as widely as Will's various factually and logically challenged op-eds. Here's Tom Toles (of the Washington Post!) on George Will: