Classic Krugman

Check out this video on Bloomberg.

The story goes something like this.  In the remark shown on the screen, Paul Krugman cautioned that he is not calling someone a name (via a Monty Python reference lost on the speaker), but rather questioning the evidence for his view.  The stunningly clueless commentator remarks that this is “classic Krugman” for “going after a person,” which is greeted with all sorts of agreement from the assembled panel brainless commentators.  She then refers to Niall Ferguson, who in his turn says Paul Krugman uses ad hominem arguments because he must have been abused as a child.  That, of course, is an actual ad hominem; Krugman’s is not.  You just cannot be this dumb.

About John Casey

Blogger
This entry was posted in Paul Krugman, Specious allegations of fallacy and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Classic Krugman

  1. John Casey says:

    Hey Nal, thanks for the tip, though it proved to be unhelpful. My trouble invovles my somewhat problematic editor. It just doesn’t want to embed video normally, so I have to open up the code, etc.

  2. Aaron says:

    You just cannot be this dumb.

    Fools or frauds?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>